Hungry Rats: Contribution and Collaboration!

Posted by connor on April 12, 2010

First, I’m pleased to announce a new contributor to the Hungry Rats project. Nick Carone, a screenwriter from Chicago, is putting together an original work of fiction set in Flint during the Ratman murders. I have put his photo and a short bio up on the website under “contributors.” While a number of artists, musicians, and designers have added their stamp to the project, Nick is the first person to do so through prose writing.

The mainstream press has neglected a whole area of work rich in potential. Dismissively branded as “fan fiction” or “derivative work,” Hungry Rats seeks to promote these inspired and often startlingly original works on equal footing with the novel itself. After all; every fiction establishs a universe that is wholly unique and self-contained. Why not explore it from the angles of film and music, photography and painting, poetry and prose, for as long as it is interesting?

If you are interested in collaborating on Hungry Rats (and don’t limit yourself; I’m interested in everything above, and everything else from biology to theater to sociology to journalism), please drop me a line and let me know what you’re thinking!

Share

Hungry Rats: A Story of Flint, Michigan

Posted by connor on March 29, 2010

In recent updates, I’ve talked about Hungry Rats through the lens of the lumber era, teen noir, and fairy tales. That leaves just two important contexts: serial killers and Flint, Michigan.

Today I’ll tackle Flint.



From Hungry Rats:

By the time the lumberjacks arrived, Flint, Michigan was already decades old. It grew from a trading post near some old Indian battlegrounds. The warriors left their ghosts when they died. The fur traders came and left their ghosts, and so did the lumberjacks. Carriage makers and auto barons. Then, a great wave came from Germany, Ireland, England, Hungary, New York, Missouri, Tennessee and Kentucky. They built cars through the second World War, tore down buildings and threw up huge chunks of concrete. Sheet metal and train tracks stretched from one end of town to the other and the factories went out in every direction. Then, half of the people left. They left their ghosts behind too.

You can’t really throw a famous book without hitting the author who wrote it from “exile”: James Joyce, Toni Morrison, Vladimir Nabokov… they all wrote about places “they were but weren’t any more.” Ernest Hemingway was perhaps the most prolific diasporic writer, living seemingly everywhere, moving along, and then later writing about it.

In my case, I haven’t lived in Flint in years, and being one of the more picked-upon communities in this country, it’s awkward writing about the city from a genre that, by definition, digs up the dregs of our social existence. In fact, Hungry Rats surprised me by being the most publication-friendly of all my writings.

That said, I don’t think anyone would question my commitment to Flint. I lived in the pleasant, stable East Village neighborhood for most of my childhood, and later rented out a couple apartments on the rough and messy Eastside. I went to high school in the nearby suburb of Flushing, which might be described as an improved Eisenhower-era enclave, and have since divided most of my adult life between Chicago and New York.

Why write about Flint and what does it have to do with Hungry Rats?



Part of the argument merits objectivity.

Flint boasts a plot arc worthy of Hamlet or King Lear: it tells a powerful, compelling, and (yes) tragic story. The city was once a small town based around a profitable trading post. Through the lumber era and the establishment of the auto industry, Flint rose to become one of the most dynamic and wealthy of America’s industrial cities, and a palpable symbol of American power as Sherman Tanks rolled off the GM lines in Grand Blanc a few miles to the south. The presence of a strident union couched prosperity in pragmatic, real-world terms, and local institutions seemed to deliver on their promises. The height of Flint’s prestige was the height of American prestige, period.

But proseperity was fleeting. In a few decades, Flint suffered from ugliness both social (white flight) and economic (deindustrialization). Today, just 150 years into the story, much of the city is scarred and blighted, and much of it has burned down. Most tellingly, much of the city has been abandoned, and side streets can be very quiet at times. Whenever I bring a visitor there, they are struck by the severity of these images. And yet, once that first impression has settled a little, they are surprised by the richness of life there, the responding sharpness and energy and innovation: in street fairs, underground concerts, back porch art, late night cruises. Really: the city is half-empty and bankrupt, but also packed to the neck with astonishing art, music, theater, and the most poetic roads you’ve ever driven.

Quite simply, Flint, Michigan is one hell of a story, and I’m one of a small number of humans qualified to tell it.



Part of the argument demands subjectivity.
Hungry Rats is my strongest novel to date, and Hungry Rats couldn’t have happened without Flint.

In 2003, I was a starving artist, emphasis on the word “starving,” and I decided to move back to Flint for the summer to get some more writing done. The plan was to work part-time and to live off a bit of money I’d saved up while temping in Chicago. The cost of living is a lot less in Flint, so I got a job as a dishwasher (night-shift on weekends) at the famous Angelo’s Coney Island, and I took out a lease on Maryland Ave. near Iowa. The Eastside is a rapidly changing neighborhood with a few landlords leasing apartments to dozens, or hundreds, of families. Things change year-by-year and block-by-block, and this particular block was just then taking a turn for the worse.

At the same time, I heard about a writing project called National Novel Writing Month, in which one creates a 50,000-word novel draft between November 1st and November 30th. I started planning, and quickly decided that I wanted to write a noirish mystery. I thought it would be fun to write in second person, and I dimly imagined activating some menace from an long, unburied past nosing its way into the present. But what do do and where to begin?

One night — it might have been July, or it might have been August — my girlfriend and I went out for a pleasant drive. We left the city long after dark and grabbed a late meal at a coney island up near the reservoir. We drove back into Flint, the long way around, checking out the old mansions and willow-heavy parks on the southwest side; Woodcroft where the most famous engineers and executives from the world’s largest corporation used to live. Then, I drove back home around Kearsley Park, a beautiful old space modeled on Olmstead and Vaux’s New York spaces. This put me on a notorious thoroughfare with a lot of abandoned shacks and vacant lots, so I wasn’t too surprised when I saw a sack of garbarge lying in the middle of the road. “Oh, that’s nice,” I thought, when I realized that the sack was open, spilling trash into the street. And then I suddenly saw that the trash wasn’t trash, but a human being.

We sped home and called 911 at once.

The newspaper typically reports homicides with clocklike reliability, and nothing was posted in subsequent days, so I assume that the person we saw wasn’t dead; perhaps she had gotten drunk and passed out. I probably won’t ever know for sure. Certainly, I wish and hope that nothing serious happened there.

Later, I recalled another story a friend had told me; probably made up, probably to frighten me. We were camping on Lake Michigan (in those days, you really could camp out on the Warren Dunes parking lot for five dollars), and on one particularly foggy night he told me that he had seen three people in black robes, wading into the lake, lifting their arms to the sky for God knows what reason.



I’ve really been blessed in life; I’m luckier than most people I know, so much so that I often don’t know what to do about it. It is both bizarre and a little unsettling that this novel, soon to be published, is so firmly rooted in my own experiences, which are themselves, isolated and non-representational.

That said, I can own this:

If you read Chapter One here, I lived in Meredith’s house. I’ve seen things that she has seen and I’ve heard things that she has heard, and they all combined in 2003, and in five minutes there I knew the plot of the novel I’ve been developing for the last seven years. Funny, huh?

But no, there is no Hungry Rats without Flint.

There is absolutely no story whatsoever.

Share

A Manifesto for Hungry Rats

Posted by connor on February 10, 2010

WHY SELF-PUBLISH?

First, I want to address the elephant in the room. For many years, self-publication was considered a symptom of wealthy mediocrity. Not that there weren’t exceptions. Perhaps you’ve heard of Benjamin Franklin, Edgar Allan Poe, Gertrude Stein, Walt Whitman, Charles Dickens, and Mark Twain? All were self-published. However the conventional wisdom (and in many cases, the reality) has been that if you were self-published, it was because you just weren’t that good. Or else, why wouldn’t someone have published you?


TRADITIONAL-PRESSES TODAY

I don’t want to cry foul, but contexts are hugely important. The publishing industry is going through a period of contraction. Major presses are losing money much as the music industry has been for a decade. In large part, publishers have not been able to adapt rapidly enough to new technology. And while we live in an unusually conservative era for literature in general, an additional economic effect is that publishers tend to stick with what is “safe” and profitable: a range of nonfiction, memoirs, and childrens literature.

Typically, Hungry Rats would be more of an ideal match for the small presses that have supported avant-garde literature for the last hundred years. And yet, these presses are feeling the squeeze as well. Major retailers are less likely to stock titles pressed on a smaller scale, and some very famous presses (such as the venerable New Directions) have shifted their focus to works in translation.

Even where publication is possible, the results are not always great. One month ago, a published friend explained that her press had not supplied her with any promotional budget whatsoever; a typical problem for a small-press. Another friend found himself stuck with a mediocre cover and had no recourse because even the smallest presses typically contract with preferred cover designers and leave the writer out of negotiations. These situations are, unfortunately, more the norm than the exception.

The net effect of all of this is that it is a particularly bad time to seek to publish experimental work in an established marketplace.


SELF-PUBLICATION TODAY

But there’s room for a “glass half-full” argument. As traditional publishers have become less and less of a viable option, self-publication has become more reasonable.

For example, the standard offset printing process cost thousands of dollars and because the cost of printing was so great, a huge amount of money could be lost by over- or underestimating sales potential. This alone was reason enough to discourage most authors from self-publishing.  New digital printing processes are able to print a books one-at-a-time, and while the profit per book is less, the decreased overhead and risk more than compensates on a smaller print run. As a result, self-publishing has increased as it is financially possible for more writers.

Also, the fact that traditional publishers have not responded to new technologies means that self-published authors have room to create a more innovative and imaginative promotional strategy than they could in collaboration with a publisher. For example, I have modeled my strategy for Hungry Rats on that of many bands I respect; a novel can be the site of and premise for artistic invention. We know this from famous books that have been made into movies, art, music, and spin-offs, but there is no reason that these initiatives cannot be executed on a smaller scale. In fact, Hungry Rats has already resulted in the recording of two songs: “The Hunger of the Rats” by Mr. Automatic and the “Hungry Rats Theme” by Elisabeth Blair.


MY OWN STORY

I have only considered self-publication as something of a last resort, and this decision caps off a three-year process of submission. In that time, I have called upon every publishing contact I have made in Chicago, New York, California, and Michigan, and I have submitted Hungry Rats to dozens of presses and literary agents. In many cases, it was dismissed peremptorily. Publication through a slush pile is unlikely under the very best of circumstances, and as I described, the market is going against me.  Significantly, the more nuanced rejections noted the novel’s “niche-market” and “unconventionality” of the writing (as opposed to any lack of quality).

As time has gone on, self-publication has seemed more and more reasonable. For starters, I am convinced of the quality of the novel I am publishing. Hungry Rats has been thoroughly vetted. It has been revised six times since its initial draft in 2003, and the key fourth revision was executed at the New School under the scrutiny of a peer group and the guidance of Jeffery Renard Allen, author of the groundbreaking novel Rails Under My Back. Hungry Rats has received both conventional praise from readers and reviewers — one commenter said that it was “the best project of this sort I’ve ever seen” — as well endorsements specific to the stylized commentary and cynicism of noir: “it left me with a sense of palpable evil” and “I was profoundly disturbed.”

Additionally, I am now able to take advantage of a brilliant editor — Elisabeth Blair — and a wonderful designer — Sam Perkins-Harbin of Forge 22. I have to consider my resources equal to those of many small-presses, and the corresponding creative control is both liberating and intimidating.

It is not without reluctance that I pursue this route to publication, but it is also with a keen appreciation of the opportunities it offers. Writing is a risky career under the best of circumstances. Sometimes, the rewards will only respond to an increase in risk. Given the length of this novel’s arc the risk is reasonable.


A FINAL WORD

I came into the arts by what some might call a radical ideology. Not political radicalism, but artistic radicalism: a presumption of relevance. It started with theater: the Michigan Renaissance Festival taught a kind of sketch improv that built characters over months from the ground up, and Flint Youth Theatre was defiantly experimental despite common and mistaken assumptions about the lack of sophistication in a youth audience. In college, University Theater was almost entirely student run, allowing me to take risks and make mistakes that would not have been possible at most programs. And after I made the change to prose writing, the New School offered not only holistic engagement through workshops, seminars, and colloquia, but a broad approach to literary concentration and plenty of faculty debate and dissent.

In short, I have been taught to believe that the arts are not only a challenging and critically engaging field, but that they are rich and important to culture. That no healthy culture can exist without healthy arts.

Now I could have gone into law, or I could have gone into the social sciences, and these are very worthy and tangible ways to make a positive impact on the world. Today, more than thirteen years into a career in the arts, and having filled that time creating socially dynamic writing, I am straining to see a positive result — a positive difference — in the world as a result of how I have spent my time.

Hungry Rats is not the last stand, per se, but I do feel it is a reckoning for me personally that I should not underestimate. I am now at a major life juncture; my wife and I are expecting a child, and will probably be moving into a house in the next year or so. The amount of time I can sink into a career unwilling to yield results (or payment) is becoming something I cannot responsibly take for granted.

If Hungry Rats fails, then I will have to soberly assess my own talents and abilities, and whether this really is the best way to “leave the world a better place.” I will have to ask this question and proactively respond to the answer.

In short, this is my novel, and this is why I believe it has to be published. This is why I am publishing it this year, and why I am choosing to self-publish.

I have written this to answer the questions of potential donors and allies, but I realize that I have probably not answered all areas of concern. I hope, therefore, that you will contact me with any outstanding ideas, problems, opportunities, or questions.

Thank you for your continued support.

Share